Description
Hey everyone-
I'm student teaching this semester at a middle school and an elementary school. I wanted to get some opinions on how they grade their students' on their fitness tests, such as the pacer test, push-up test, sit-and-reach test, etc. Many teachers tell me that they pretty much grade their students on their ability, meaning if a student gets 2 push-ups, that's "developing" when comparing that score to the district standards/requirements, so he/she would have to get a 1. The tell me their reasoning behind this is that every other class has their standards that students SHOULD be at (i.e. 2nd graders should be able to multiply by 3's). Well, if those students aren't able to multiply, then their grade suffers because it's part of their 2nd grade criteria. Should P.E. be the same when it comes to fitness testing?
I also know a few P.E. teachers who grade their students just on improvement. For instance, if they had a student that did 5 push-ups for the pre-test, and then 5-6 weeks later that SAME student does 11 push-ups, they will give that student a 3 (proficient) or 4 (advanced) for that test, even though 11 isn't considered proficient or advanced under the district's rubric.
What do you think is the more appropriate/better way to grade fitness testing? I would appreicate it I could get a few replies on this. Thanks!!
-Brian